“the rival conceptions of God”
i have a hard time keeping up with old clive here.
he makes his point very slowly and precisely, making the
reader think through what he is saying.
i am starting to think that i can’t do a very good job of writing
about what clive has written, even when the reading is broken
down into short chapters, without writing exactly what he has said.
i guess i’m just not very good at book reporting. and i can’t write it
in a way that is interesting enough for you to want to read my post on it.
so i’m just going to say that reading this book is a good thing so far.
there are some good posts on it here.